|
|
|
|
Fur Is Green sparks new unheard dialogs...
|
|
|
|
|
Gavin Critch with Style File and the new Fur Is Green campaign.
Watch the video!
|
|
|
|
|
" Has no one @ Hippyshopper thought through the green side of fur? I mean, I totally get the 'killing cute little animals' I mean, I don't think that I personally could kill an animal physically, but that is because I have been wrapped in cotton wool all my life. But less of the social implications of living in a western society and more on the fur. I have to admit, for a long while, I always thought fur was bad because I was told it was bad... Read more > " - Dani, blogger from Hippyshopper.com
|
|
|
Fur Is Green gets talked about in the Newspapers & on the Web!
|
|
| Fur Is Green Media Coverage |
November 1, 2008
National Post (Weekend Post)

Nothing to fear but fur itself by Nathalie Atkinson, National Post The fashion statement that's older than Canada itself is being rebranded as an environmentally responsible choice, but not everyone's buying it.
Henri Bendel recently went fur-free. There isn't a rabbit-trimmed toque or mink bagatelle to be found at the Fifth Avenue department store. The decision was the initiative of Bendel's parent company, Limited Brands (which also owns Victoria's Secret, Bath & Body Works and five others), making the $10-billion company entirely fur-free.
More
|
|
|
|
October 1, 2008
The Gazette (Montreal)

OPTIMISM ON THE RACCOON-RABIES FRONT An immunological barrier is now in place to help protect Montreal and the South Shore from an outbreak CHERYL CORNACCHIA, The Gazette Montreal remains the only Canadian city that has ever had to confront raccoon rabies on its doorstep - it never threatened Toronto or Ottawa before it was eradicated in Ontario in 2005.
|
But three years into Quebec's fight against the virulent rabies strain that in a worst-case scenario could spread from raccoons to dogs and cats and then humans, Quebec's lead scientist on raccoon rabies is expressing guarded optimism. |
More
|
|
|
|
January 9, 2008
The Australian

Climate change cure is warm and fuzzy by Janet Albrechtsen, The Australian CANADA: I am starting to warm to this whole climate change business. Arrived in Vancouver for a night just before 2007 drew to a close. With barely a few hours remaining before the stores closed, I raced out and bought a fur coat. A long coat cascading down to my ankles, light as a feather and as warm as a ... well ... fur.
More
|
|
|
|
December 12, 2007
Calgary Herald

PETA hits a foul by Michael Morrison, Calgary Herald (Blog)Today PETA launched one of its biggest smear campaigns against a single person (or twins in this case) in recent memory. The victims this time are none are famous twins Mary-Kate and Ashley Olsen. You probably remember them as the cute, scene-stealing Michelle Tanner on the long-running sitcom Full House. (Bonus points to those who remember them in New York Minute.) PETA has often criticized the famous twins for both wearing fur and using it in their clothing lines. However, a campaign against someone of their stature usually means putting them on top of a “Worst Offenders” list, but PETA took it one step further today when they renamed the Olsen Twins, The Trolsen Twins.
More
|
|
|
|
November 28, 2007
Green Daily, GreenDaily.com

Fur is Green, says Fur Council by GreenDaily.com
"Fur is green", says the Fur Council of Canada, proof that everyone is jumping on the green bandwagon. According to the Council, fur fits the following definition of a green product:
- Renewable
- Reusable
- Durable
- Biodegradable, non-toxic
- Energy-efficient
One of the best points the Council makes is that synthetic alternatives made from petroleum-based sources are certainly not "greener" than fur. They have many more talking points including that the fur industry in Canada protects the land and provides jobs for tens of thousands of rural and aboriginal Canadians.
I suppose if the animals are slaughtered humanely and you wear the fur coat forever, fur could be considered green. But is that always the case? Check out their (one-sided) website and decide for yourself.
by Green Daily www.GreenDaily.com
More
|
|
|
|
November 27, 2007
Ottawa Sun
|
 Fur business green or mean? Animal rights activists, Fur Council of Canada at odds over ad campaign by Ann Marie McQueen, Sun Media Fur business green or mean? Animal rights activists, Fur Council of Canada at odds over ad campaign Fur business green or mean? Animal rights activists, Fur Council of Canada at odds over ad campaign A slick new advertising campaign aims to reframe the fur industry as a friend of the environment.
The Fur Council of Canada launched print ads last week calling fur "eco-fashion" in an effort to reassure consumers about their product and counter anti-fur campaigns of the past.
The Montreal-based council represents about 70,000 members, most of them trappers, said Alan Herscovici, the council's executive vice-president.
"It was important to explain the real story of the fur industry," said Herscovici. "And that is 'if you care about nature and protecting the environment, fur is an excellent choice."
More
|
|
|
|
November 27, 2007
Hippyshopper, hippyshopper.com
|

Hippyshopper From Dani, a blogger at Hippyshopper.comHas no one @ Hippyshopper thought through the green side of fur? I mean, I totally get the 'killing cute little animals' I mean, I don't think that I personally could kill an animal physically, but that is because I have been wrapped in cotton wool all my life. But less of the social implications of living in a western society and more on the fur.
I have to admit, for a long while, I always thought fur was bad because I was told it was bad. In fact, one of the most enduring memories I have about fur is from my childhood. I went to a jumble sale (anyone remember those?) and fell in love with this fur collar from a winter coat. It was just the collar, no coat with it. I bought it with my pocket money, and I remember hiding it under my dress (i wasn't supposed to buy anything) Anyway, I don't think my mum knew about it since it was ages after that she found it. It had been living in my doll box, and mum had come upstairs to play with me. Of course she found the fur collar. Well, I remember being yelled at. How the fur was dirty because it had come off an animal. How the animal had been murdered. She showed my pictures from my story books, and asked me if I liked wearing Wally the Witty Weasel, or if I wanted to eat Marys little lamb. My mum burned the collar in the garden. Since then, I had NEVER questioned what I had been told to believe. (On a side note, I also attribute this event to the reason I started eating meat)
It wasn't until I visited Russia a few years back that I became aware of the true environmentally ethical side of fur and that I realised that I had been wrong. Yes, animals are trapped, but not in some barbaric, torture, cruel way. But not only that, but I saw first hand the ruin and devastation the oil industry cause. It honestly made me think. I have loved fur ever since I was little, and I had thought I had been doing the right thing by buying synthetic. Synthetic means oil. Synthetic is not biodegradable.
I don't think I could EVER buy a fur from an animal from a battery, the same way I could never buy an egg from a battery hen, but at the same time, I would and most likely will buy a fur from small traders that actually use fur trading for their lively hood. They are the ones that know how to treat the animals and they are the ones that will go off into the forest mid summer and not return for many months, living off the land, and producing a carbon footprint so small that I probably have used the same amount in the time it has taken me to write this message using a laptop.
Fur has its pros and cons. It is most definitely not a black and white argument!
More
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |